While the EU is on a long-standing path for its raw material policy, including criticality aspect, we highly welcome the increase emphasis put on this matter and the announced intention to increase efforts besides the Raw material strategy that is already in place (COM (2020)474).
EMF
EMFEMA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 322887113869-18
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1474 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1008 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2014
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EMFEMA is associated member of FEFAC (European Feed Manufacturers' Federation)
- EMFEMA is member of the Feed Chain Task Force, the industry platform taking care of the EU Feed Materials Catalogue
- EMFEMA is member of PARI-EFSA (Partnership of
- Associations Representing Industries within EFSA’s Remit)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Manufacturers of Feed Minerals Association (EMFEMA)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EMFEMA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EMFEMA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EMFEMA filed 2 positions between 16 Aug 2022 and 25 Nov 2022, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
Considering the period chosen for the present call, we would like to focus our input on one specific element: the need for an impact assessment. While the target of creating an open and common basis of data for various assessment through some convergence of different notification/authorisation regimes is appreciated, one cannot ignore the diversity and complexity of the legislations and data collection/assessment…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EMFEMA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 12.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EMFEMA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.