ECPAT Sweden supports the third legislative option, with a binding obligation for relevant service providers to detect, report and remove known and new child sexual abuse from their services, including text-based threats.
ES
ECPAT Sweden
NGO · Sweden
identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track ECPAT in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ECPAT Sweden? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ECPAT Sweden filed 3 positions between 14 Dec 2020 and 21 May 2024, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2020 · 1 filed2024 · 2 filed
What they argued
ECPAT Sweden welcomes the Commissions proposal for a recast of directive 2011/93/EU and its commitment to combat and prevent child sexual abuse and exploitation online and offline. The recast is an important step towards harmonizing national legislation among Member states regarding substantial criminal law, procedural law, prevention, care and support as well as victims rights to compensation.
ECPAT Sweden welcomes the Commission's proposal to extend the temporary derogation from specific provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC aimed at combating online child sexual abuse. We want to stress the importance of extending this derogation beyond its current expiry date, ensuring no lapse in the protection of children online.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ECPAT Sweden next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 20.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ECPAT Sweden’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.