NGO · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 528622339127-47
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #217 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
Eurogroup For Animals - https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/
Asia for Animals Coalitions - https://asiaforanimals.com/
World Federation for Animals - https://wfa.org/
Plantebranchen - https://www.plantebranchen.dk/
Concito - https://concito.dk/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Søborg, Denmark
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Dyrenes Beskyttelse? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Dyrenes Beskyttelse filed 3 positions between 31 Mar 2026 and 4 Aug 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Europe has a unique opportunity to make biotechnology a driver for both innovation and more modern health research. The future European Biotech Act I should therefore focus not only on strengthening Europe’s competitiveness, but also on promoting those technologies that can deliver more human-relevant research while reducing reliance on animal testing.
Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission
Animal Protection Denmark welcomes the opportunity to respond to the consultation on the EU Biotech Act II. Our response can be found in the attached document. Parts of our response simply repeat the additional information we submitted to the public consultation on the Biotech Act in November 2025, and we therefore also refer to that submission.
Animal protection mid-term evaluation of CAP 2023-2027: The EU’s agricultural support scheme is a key policy instrument for Europe’s food production, but in its current form it does not deliver enough on the public goods that society needs and citizens expect.
Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Dyrenes Beskyttelse’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.