Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Good day, I believe that the methodology for calculating emissions is difficult to verify by third parties and unfortunately voted to collect a new duty that will make Europe less competitive with the rest of the world again, which will not comply with these requirements. The result will be an isolation of our economy, a new economic earthquake that will put in great difficulty, those who are already today.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Good day, to date, there is still no clear information on real Benchmark, the cost of CBAM certificates, which means that entrepreneurs cannot financially plan investments, strategic choices, and this is nothing more than the mirror of those who govern us, that is to say, not having fallen into reality.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Dynafir Srl’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.