In our view, the EU needs holistic and functional solutions to protect public interest activities and strengthen Europes research, innovation and education ecosystem. The EU should recognise the problematic and exploitative business model of modern scientific publishing and protect academic authors through a harmonised EU Secondary Publication Right, enabling immediate open access (no embargo, VoR) to publicly…
DR
Digital Republic
NGO · Bulgaria
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Digital in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Digital Republic? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Digital Republic filed 2 positions between 10 Sept 2025 and 25 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The current state of scholarly publishing presents challenges of multiple kinds, including the adequacy of established research evaluation systems. Market realities in academic publishing create difficulties for the research community, ranging from the devaluation of scientific quality in the publish or perish culture, through systemic bias in the evaluation of the humanities, social sciences and low-resource…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Digital Republic next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 14.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Digital Republic’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.