Public authority · Germany · EU Transparency Register 84697226195-47
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #45 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since
Declares membership of
Media Board - European Board for Media Services (www.media-board.europa.eu)
EPRA - European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (www.epra.org)
IIC - International Institute of Communications (www.iicom.org)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Other organisations
Registered as
Die Medienanstalten - Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Landesmedienanstalten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Die Medienanstalten)
Head office
Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at die medienanstalten ALM GbR? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
die medienanstalten ALM GbR filed 3 positions between 28 May 2025 and 17 Dec 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Stellungnahme der Landesmedienanstalten im Rahmen Sondierungskonsultation Digital Networks Act - Stand: 11.07.2025 DLM | Der Koordinator des Fachausschusses Infrastruktur und Innovation ______________________________________________________ 1. Einleitung Die 14 Landesmedienanstalten sind als staatsfern organisierte Aufsichtsbehörden zentral für die Regulierung von privatem Rundfunk und Telemedien in Deutschland.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Germanys media authorities expressly welcome the fact that AI regulatory sandboxes can be established not only horizontally, but also in specific sectors, particularly in the media sector, as well as at regional and local level. It is crucial that these structures are integrated in and interoperable to the existing independent system of media regulation.
Dear colleagues, please find attached the opinion of the German regional media authorities on the present draft implementing regulation on the format, submission and technical specifications of the transparency notes under the Veorordnung on the transparency and targeting of political advertising. Yours sincerely, Mr [name removed]
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from die medienanstalten ALM GbR’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
