Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CG

cylib GmbH

Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 7950660102545-79

3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #480 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2026
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Beirat Kompetenzzentrum für zirkuläre Wirtschaft (DE) – Founder & Co-CEO Dr. Lilian Schwich as an advisory board member
  • Recharge (EU)
  • Battery Circle Aachen (DE)
  • Beirats Batterieforschung (DE) – Founder Paul Sabarny as an advisory board member
  • Cleantech for Europe (EU)
  • EIC Scaling Club (EU)
  • Kompetenznetzwerk Lithium-Ionen-Batterien(DE)
  • Made4Germany (DE)
  • RESPOND Accelerator (DE)
  • Scale-Up NRW (DE)
  • Startup Verband (DE)
  • Tech for Net Zero (EU)[

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Aachen, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track cylib in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow cylib GmbH

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at cylib GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

cylib GmbH filed 3 positions between 24 May 2024 and 9 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2024 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 24 May 2024source

Yesterday, as a battery recycler, we will source green electricity from a PV system that we do not operate ourselves. Therefore, in our opinion, the purchase of electricity from other renewable sources should also be taken into account in the CO2 footprint calculation. Only the energy mix of the country is not incentivising green electricity initiatives with other partners. Yours sincerely, [name removed]

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Methodology for calculation and verification of recycled content in batteriesfiled 9 Sept 2026PDFsource

The European Commissions draft delegated act will determine how recycled content is calculated, verified and documented in batteries. For a recycling company, these rules will influence whether material from black mass and other battery waste streams is recognized fairly, whether hydrometallurgical processes can operate at scale, and whether the EU framework gives investors a credible signal to build European…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put cylib GmbH next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 38.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from cylib GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.