Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CG

cylib GmbH

Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 7950660102545-79

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #389 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2026
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Beirat Kompetenzzentrum für zirkuläre Wirtschaft (DE) – Founder & Co-CEO Dr. Lilian Schwich as an advisory board member
  • Recharge (EU)
  • Battery Circle Aachen (DE)
  • Beirats Batterieforschung (DE) – Founder Paul Sabarny as an advisory board member
  • Cleantech for Europe (EU)
  • EIC Scaling Club (EU)
  • Kompetenznetzwerk Lithium-Ionen-Batterien(DE)
  • Made4Germany (DE)
  • RESPOND Accelerator (DE)
  • Scale-Up NRW (DE)
  • Startup Verband (DE)
  • Tech for Net Zero (EU)[

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Aachen, Germany

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track cylib in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at cylib GmbH? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files cylib GmbH engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from cylib GmbH or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

cylib GmbH filed 2 positions between 24 May 2024 and 17 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2024 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 24 May 2024source

Yesterday, as a battery recycler, we will source green electricity from a PV system that we do not operate ourselves. Therefore, in our opinion, the purchase of electricity from other renewable sources should also be taken into account in the CO2 footprint calculation. Only the energy mix of the country is not incentivising green electricity initiatives with other partners. Yours sincerely, [name removed]

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 17.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from cylib GmbH’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.