- The proposal sets a Category 1 (conventional-like) whereby NGT products undergo a verification process to confirm if they have met the required criteria listed in Annex I. Yet, even if meeting the specified criteria, and being deemed conventional-like, these products be subject to a different regulatory framework as conventional breeding products, that create unjustified complexities and barriers, including: being…
CC
CropLife Canada
Industry association · Canada
3
positions filed
in the 655 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 655 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 655 consultation files tracked so far (56,999 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track CropLife in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CropLife Canada? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CropLife Canada filed 3 positions between 19 Oct 2023 and 28 Sept 2026, across 2 of the 655 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2023 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
CropLife Canada welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Commissions call for evidence on the implementing NGT framework. CropLife Canada is the national trade association representing Canadas plant science industry, including companies involved in developing and commercializing crop protection products and plant biotechnology.
CropLife Canada welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Commissions call for evidence on Regulation 1388/2026. This regulation is a welcome development that brings the EU closer to the growing global regulatory consensus on NGTs, including Canada.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put CropLife Canada next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 42.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CropLife Canada’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.