Company · France
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Consultant in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Consultant? so we know who speaks for it.
Consultant filed 3 positions between 13 Jan 2023 and 18 Aug 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
HI, in my view, are the reasons why the transition period should be extended: — Impact of the health crisis on businesses: concerns about the “survival” of the activity have hampered the work to comply with the Regulation – Impact of the health crisis on trade undertaken/notified bodies/approach to obtaining the EC – Current difficulties in the availability of notified bodies to carry out audits. Warmly
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Unfortunately, the FPR is not delivering on its objectives as expected- which in principle are strongly supported by industry. From the point of view of an expert in growing media, who has worked for decades in R&D as well as in developing European standardards, there are reasons why growing media manufacturers have little or no interest in obtaining the CE mark. Please view the attachment for more information.
Aiming for an application date in Q1 / April 2027 continues to place a significant burden on affected companies and authorities. The most recent amendment to the PIC Regulation will apply from 1 October 2026, meaning that export notifications must already be prepared and submitted from August 2026 onwards, including possible waiver submissions in October 2026.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Consultant next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Consultant’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.