Industry association · Italy
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Confindustria in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Confindustria Ceramica? so we know who speaks for it.
Confindustria Ceramica filed 6 positions between 26 Jun 2019 and 17 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
LIAA is an important initiative insofar as it recognises the role of energy-intensive industries. However, as it stands, the proposal remains more oriented towards decarbonisation than competitiveness and does not appear sufficient on its own to counter the risk of deindustrialisation. For the ceramics sector, the definition of Union origin is of particular relevance.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Posizione industria ceramica italiana su IAA Definizione di «Unione» La definizione dell’attuale testo di IAA del termine «Unione» ha connotazioni estremamente mercantiliste, e che rischiano di andare contro l’obiettivo dello stesso IAA di rafforzare la manifattura europea ed il traguardo della Commissione di portare la quota della manifattura dal 14,3% del PIL UE (2024) al 20% entro il 2035.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Confindustria Ceramica support CerameUnie position paper. We are also looking at that the impact assessment regarding the proposed carbon border adjustment measures. The impact assessment should also include “the mechanism can preserve and the competitiveness of EU products on export markets and should also address the fact that for sectors like the dynamic carbon leakage measures”.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The European Commission’s proposal to update the ETS benchmarks for the period 20262030 would lead to drastic reductions in the benchmarks for the ceramics sector: the fuel benchmark would decrease by 50 % compared to 20132020, while the relevant product benchmarks for the different ceramic sectors would be reduced by around 40 % over the same period.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
12 July 2022 Confindustria Ceramica position paper on the proposal for a revised Construction Products Regulation On 30 March 2022, the European Commission published its proposal for a revised Construction Products Regulation (CPR).
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Confindustria Ceramica endorse the message shared by CerameUnie here reported: The European Federation of Ceramic Table- and Ornamentalware (FEPF) welcomes the start of the “Impact Assessment on migration limits for lead, cadmium, and possibly other metals from ceramic and vitreous food contact materials”, with an inception impact assessment.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Confindustria Ceramica next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 159.
Everything on this page comes from Confindustria Ceramica’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.