Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CDR

Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT

Trade union · France · EU Transparency Register 597299249832-87

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #238 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Confédération Syndicale Internationale (CSI)
  • https://www.ituc-csi.org/fr
  • Confédération Européenne des Syndicats (CES)
  • https://www.etuc.org/fr

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) (CGT)
Head office
Montreuil Cedex, France

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Confédération in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT filed 2 positions between 28 Jan 2026 and 18 Sept 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Fair labour mobility packagefiled 28 Jan 2026source

The CGT welcomes the Commission’s intention to present a fair labour mobility package. While freedom of movement for workers within the EU is an essential freedom, ‘it entails the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment’ (Article 45 (2) TFEU).

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Evaluation of the Employers Sanctions Directivefiled 18 Sept 2026PDFsource

The CGT presents two examples setting out the shortcomings of this Directive. First of all, I consider it essential to address the general philosophy of the Directive. The problem is not immigrationbut the pervasive pursuit of profit maximisation. This is the vulnerability of workers which is a source of overexploitation, which is linked to administrative and social precariousness.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.