Cittadini per laria considers that it is crucial for the improvement of air quality in Europe, especially in the most critical areas like the Po valley, and to achieve a relevant decrease of CO2 emissions, to make sure that new policies on companies mobility and acquisition of new fleets are drastically modified.
CPL
Cittadini per l'aria
NGO · Italy · EU Transparency Register 372227817849-54
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #314 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://www.eeb.org since October 2015
- https://www.transportenvironment.org/ since March 2016
- https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/ since 2020
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- CITTADINI PER L'ARIA
- Head office
- Milano, Italy
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Cittadini in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Cittadini per l'aria? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Cittadini per l'aria filed 2 positions between 26 Aug 2025 and 25 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
While we understand that the matter is highly technical we consider that a system that relies on unclear rules becomes the cause of problems rather than solutions. It in facts seems also from the initial comments that have been given to the implementing act that some contrasts exist on the level of the shared scientific knowledge reached in the modeling field.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Cittadini per l'aria’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.