On behalf of CESAER, the association of more than 50 leading universities of science and technology across Europe, I am pleased to submit our input to the consultation on the European Innovation Act. We have chosen to provide our contribution in the form of an attached input note.
CESAER
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 484959115993-15
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #312 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- EOSC association
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Conference of European Schools for Advanced Engineering Education and Research (CESAER)
- Head office
- LEUVEN, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track CESAER in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at CESAER? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
CESAER filed 2 positions between 3 Oct 2025 and 2 Apr 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
CESAER, representing 56 leading universities of science and technology in Europe, welcomes the European Commissions initiative to address housing affordability. As outlined in our position European Affordable Housing Plan housing Europes talent (October 2025), affordable housing is not only a social necessity but also an essential enabler of excellence in education, research, and innovation, and thereby of Europes…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Danish Industry · 2 files in common
- CPME · 2 files in common
- Impact Europe · 2 files in common
- Provincie Utrecht · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from CESAER’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.