Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CEL

CELPA

Industry association · Portugal

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

4
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 639 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track CELPA in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at CELPA? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files CELPA engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 4 files, from CELPA or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

CELPA filed 4 positions between 26 Oct 2020 and 22 Feb 2022, across 4 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.

2020 · 2 filed2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed

What they argued

Waste Framework Directive: textiles and food wastefiled 22 Feb 2022PDFsource

CELPA - The Portuguese Pulp and Paper Association welcomes the revision of EU waste framework. We endorse the policy maker’s intention to optimise waste management systems to support higher recycling rates, cleaner secondary raw materials, to halve the amount of residual (non-recycled) municipal waste by 2030, and to ensure high-quality recycling.

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 18 Nov 2021PDFsource

R. Marquês Sá da Bandeira, 74, 2º 1069-076 Lisboa, Portugal Tel. [phone removed] Fax. [phone removed] E-mail. [email removed] http://www.celpa.pt Position CELPA Portuguese Pulp and Paper Association Date: 18 november 2021 Comments on the EU Commission proposal for a regulation establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism Subject: The EU Commission Proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) was…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)filed 26 Nov 2020source

The European Commission stresses the importance of a just and inclusive transition to climate neutrality. CELPA — Papermaking Association welcomes the 2050 climate neutrality target. While the 2030 climate target has increased to 55 %, CELPA emphasises the importance of not relying much on forest sinks due to the likelihood of increased natural disturbances in the near future.

Filed in Portuguese · English published by the European Commission

Industrial Emissions Portalfiled 26 Oct 2020PDFsource

The Portuguese Pulp and Paper Association (CELPA) welcomes the Inception Impact Assessment on the revision of the Regulation on the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). We, in the paper industry, are firmly convinced that, with the help of the new European Green Deal, we can reduce our impact on climate change while increasing production in Europe.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put CELPA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 85.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from CELPA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.