Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CA

Celltech AB

Company · Sweden

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Celltech in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Celltech AB? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Celltech AB engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Celltech AB or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Celltech AB filed 2 positions on 12 Jun 2025, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Amending certain Regulations as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures (Omnibus IV)filed 12 Jun 2025source

It appears that the current formulation places sole emphasis on the size of the company when determining the scope of obligations. However, it is important to clarify whether this was the intended approach. It seems disproportionate that a large company, placing only a limited number of primary batteries in one of its products, would be required to comply with the full range of obligations.

Obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies (Omnibus IV)filed 12 Jun 2025source

The current approach appears to base the applicability of obligations solely on the size of the company. It would be helpful to clarify whether this was the intended outcome. Requiring a large company to comply fully with all regulatory obligationseven in cases where it places only a minimal number of primary batteries in a productmay lead to disproportionate administrative and compliance burdens.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Celltech AB next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Celltech AB’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.