Cassandra Foundation recommends that the cultural and creative sectors AI strategy evaluate changes in creative livelihoods, not just adoption or output volume. This contribution is a synthesis of published sources and policy recommendations, prepared with generative-AI assistance. It does not report original fieldwork or represent creators or rights holders.
CF
Cassandra Foundation
Other · United Kingdom
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Cassandra in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Cassandra Foundation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Cassandra Foundation filed 4 positions between 5 Sept 2026 and 10 Sept 2026, across 4 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Cassandra Foundation recommends strengthening the implementation detail of COM(2026)502 so that cloud assurance remains meaningful throughout operation and migration, not only at recognition. 1. Make the scope of recognition unambiguous. Articles 2022 provide for audits, evidence and a public repository.
Cassandra Foundation recommends that the Quality Jobs Act assess algorithmic management through the decisions it influences, not only the technology used. This contribution proposes safeguards and evaluation questions. It does not present worker testimony, a representative survey or measured employer costs.
Cassandra Foundation recommends that the evaluation distinguish simpler administration from weaker controls. This contribution proposes evaluation methods; it does not offer exporter testimony, original survey results or estimates of compliance costs.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Cassandra Foundation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Cassandra Foundation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.