The (WFD) could improve the environmental performance of fashion and textile industries, but should focus on waste prevention reducing overproduction and disposable fashion. Measure the real life of clothes not by unreliable parameters on durability measured through mechanical strength or weight, but real use data on garments retention and use, enforcing labels for date of manufacturing, disposed garments audits.
CCH
Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute
NGO · United States
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Cashmere in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute filed 2 positions between 11 May 2023 and 22 Nov 2023, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
The proliferation of unregulated claims and labels is a pressing issue that the Green Claims Directive aims to address. The introduction of a certification framework and verification mechanism, that this directive aims to establish, should provides legal certainty and a fair set or market rules for companies' marketing activities about the sustainability concepts.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 69.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Cashmere & Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.