Summary It is the position of the Swedish Construction Federation that to promote resilience and competitiveness, the Commission must: - widen the scope of the Act to include strategic raw materials, - enhance the opportunities for exploration, extraction and refining of metals and minerals in general, - identify inconsistencies in EU legislation that may conflict with EU objectives, especially climate target…
SCF
Swedish Construction Federation
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 935848345363-67
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #676 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Svenskt Näringsliv, https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/
- European Construction Industry Federation
- FIEC
- https://www.fiec.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Byggföretagen
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Swedish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Swedish Construction Federation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Swedish Construction Federation filed 5 positions between 29 Oct 2020 and 15 Dec 2025, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
Reaction of Swedish Construction Federation to Inception Impact Assessment – EPBD Revision We understand the need to revise the EPBD to ensure alignment with the Climate Law and to enable the implementation of the goals for deep renovations in the Renovation Wave. Therefore, we will engage positively with this process and we believe that Option 3 is the most reasonable for achieving the objectives.
The Swedish Construction Federation’s comments on “Inception Impact Assessment on a Foreign Subsidy Instrument” A future instrument in addressing distortive foreign subsidies must entail legislative action while the EU simultaneously strives for improved international rules. We are therefore in favour of Option 2 in combination with Option 3, in order to ensure fair competition on the internal market.
Call for evidence for an impact assessment - Asbestos screening, registering and monitoring Introduction The Swedish Construction Federation is an industry and employer organisation for construction, civil engineering, and specialised companies. With this paper, we would like to share good practices from Sweden on limiting exposure to asbestos.
The possibility for workers to be able to move freely within the Union is of great importance for the supply of skills and ultimately for the competitiveness of businesses and the EU. This is particularly important due to the skills shortage that prevails in our sector and the majority of sectors in the labour markets.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Swedish Construction Federation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 47.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Swedish Construction Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.