Building on its leadership in the circular economy, the EU has an opportunity to lessen reliance on external energy and raw materials, reinforcing its resilience and strategic autonomy. The upcoming Circular Economy Act should address current regulatory gaps and strengthen circular value chains, while confirming its environmental commitment.
Buy Better to Build Better Coalition
Other · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 298637699431-02
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 145 other organisations on this site, they rank #34 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
- Register category
- Other organisations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Buy in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Buy Better to Build Better Coalition? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Buy Better to Build Better Coalition filed 4 positions between 8 Jul 2025 and 18 Jun 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
BBBB welcomes the Acts goal of creating lead markets for low-carbon products as a strategic tool to unlock investments for the green transition and reward the most innovative products on the EU market. While strongly supporting the original intent of the Act, the proposal falls short in delivering the strong demand signals called for in the Clean Industrial Deal.
The Buy Better to Build Better Coalition brings together forward-thinking stakeholders from industry, public authorities and civil society, under a shared commitment to mainstream public procurement as a core lever in driving decarbonisation and competitiveness of the EU construction sector.
Key recommendations: 1) Ensure a coherent legal architecture by preserving the distinction between horizontal and sector-specific rules; 2) Prioritise value-based awarding over lowest-price; 3) Optimise procurement by reducing administrative burden, harmonising rules and strengthening digital architecture; 4) Focus strategic procurement efforts on sectors with the highest societal value (e.g. construction).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 3 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 3 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 3 files in common
- Danish Chamber of Commerce · 3 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 231.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Buy Better to Build Better Coalition’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.