Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 548007950743-27
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #698 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since
Declares membership of
European Fertiliser Blenders Association https://european-blenders.org/
Deutsche Phosphor-Plattform e.V. https://www.deutsche-phosphor-plattform.de/
Deutsche Landwirtschaftsgesellschaft e.V. https://www.dlg.org
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Bundesverband Düngermischer e.V. (BVDM)
Head office
Everswinkel, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
We welcome the revision of the EU-CLP Regulation, but point out that it should not lead to an additional burden in terms of reporting obligations for economic operators. The Echa database already provides some valuable indications and the system of poison centres is sufficiently implemented.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
After a few years of practical application of the FPR, it is clear that it is coherent and works in the internal market. However, there are considerable costs and red tape associated with the implementation of manufacturers and medium-sized traders. In this way, guidance on use could be omitted, especially as farmers are themselves competent and are best placed to assess the needs of their crops.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The proposal for digital labelling under the new European Union Fertiliser Regulation, now submitted, still contains many requirements of a physical nature, in particular the labelling of fertilising products from trade to farmer and packaging companies for horticulture.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The German association of fertiliser mixers has the following comments on the labelling in the new EU Fertiliser Regulation: In order to ensure acceptance and implementation by the user, the product should be labelled as easily as possible. This applies in particular to packaging and documents to be handed over to the consumer.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Better nutrient management with the aim of reducing nutrient losses guides the efficient use of mineral fertilisers. In principle, these have a relatively high efficiency, but there are still possibilities for optimisation, for example by adding nitrification and urease inhibitors to mineral nitrogen fertilisers.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Bundesverband der Düngermischer e.V. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Bundesverband der Düngermischer e.V.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.