BSEF the International Bromine Council, welcomes the opportunity to provide written comments on the ongoing work around the EU Circular Economy Act (CEA). BSEF has been actively involved in responding to and engaging with the EU Green Deal and in particular the Circular Economy Action Plan and Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.
BSEF
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 464193921314-91
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #105 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- BSEF is a Partner organisation of CEFIC, the European Chemical Council
- A Member of American European Economic Community Association
- A Member of the UNEP Mercury Partnership
- A Member of the Kangaroo Group
- A Member of Chemistry Australia
- A Member of the Alliance for Sustainable Management of Chemical Risk - ASMoR
- A Member of i2a (International Antimony Association)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade unions and professional associations
- Registered as
- BSEF - The International Bromine Council (BSEF)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track BSEF in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at BSEF? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
BSEF filed 6 positions between 5 Aug 2020 and 6 Nov 2025, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
BSEF, The International Bromine Council, attaches the enclosed position paper on the EU Regulation on Eco-design for Sustainable Products. A summary of the key messages are as follows; • Develop a new methodology for the ESPR • Put in place a representative Eco-design Forum • Avoid duplication of existing chemical regulation for substances • Promote scientific-based Green Public Procurement criteria Thank you in…
Dear colleagues, Please see attached the full BSEF Position Paper on Commission Proposal for a Revision of the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) The BSEF Key messages: • The Revision of the CPR needs to continue to consider fire safety of construction materials, given; 1) The move towards Green Energy and EVs, and required energy storage applications in homes 2) The increased use of plastics and flammable…
BSEF Comments on Proposal for a revision of the Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals (CLP) Grouping To quote Albert Einstein: everything should be made as simple as possible but not simpler. We think that grouping should only be done where it is justified by clear scientific principles and should not be the default option.
BSEF – the International Bromine Council - welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the call for evidence and welcomes this initiative to make the use of expertise and resources more efficient by proposing the reattribution of technical and scientific work on chemicals performed under the relevant pieces of legislation to European agencies (ECHA, EFSA, EMA), including work of the Scientific Committee on Health…
BSEF position on the European Commission’s Inception Impact Assessment – Update of concentration limit values of persistent organic pollutants in waste Introduction The International Bromine Council (BSEF) acknowledges the Commission’s review of annexes IV and V of the Regulation on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP Regulation).
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put BSEF next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 228.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from BSEF’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.