BNY welcomes the European Commissions Communication on the competitiveness of the EU banking sector. BNY would like to highlight four points that BNY believes are insufficiently covered in the Communication. 1. We agree with the Commissions observation that many rules continue to apply irrespective of size or business models, resulting in unnecessary complexity and administrative burden for banks.
BNY Mellon
Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 980942613952-12
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #240 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- BNY is a member of several industry associations including:
- AMCham EU & AMCham BE https://www.amchameu.eu/
- http://www.amcham.be/
- Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) - http://www.afme.eu/
- International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) - http://www.isda.org/
- European Banking Federation (EBF) - https://www.ebf-fbe.eu/ (indirect member through membership of national banking a…
- BPFI - https://www.bpfi.ie/
- FBF - http://www.fbf.fr/
- BdB: https://bankenverband.de/
- FEBELFIN - https://www.febelfin.be/
- ABBL - http://www.abbl.lu/
- Dutch Banking Federation (NVB) http://www.nvb.nl/)
- and 2 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY)
- Head office
- New York, United states
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track BNY in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at BNY Mellon? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
BNY Mellon filed 9 positions between 18 Dec 2019 and 17 Sept 2026, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
BNY welcomes the Market Integration Package (MIP) and its policy objectives of deepening the single market, reducing fragmentation, and unlocking cross-border efficiencies for savers, issuers and intermediaries.
BNY welcomes the Market Integration Package (MIP) and its policy objectives of deepening the single market, reducing fragmentation, and unlocking cross-border efficiencies for savers, issuers and intermediaries. BNY fully supports the proposals in the Master Directive that would allow depositary banks to provide depositary services for investment funds on a cross-border basis.
BNY welcomes the opportunity to respond to the European Commissions call for evidence in relation to a planned legislative initiative entitled Savings and Investments Union: Fostering integration, scale and efficient supervision in the single market.
In summary, we are concerned that MiFID-authorised asset managers are being brought into scope of the EU intermediate parent undertaking (EU IPU) requirements. Please refer to our submitted letter which has more detail, and drafting solutions. Our letter also comments on internal TLAC.
BNY Mellon welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on the FASTER Proposal. We support many elements of the Proposal, and believe that, if the Proposal is implemented, it will make a significant contribution to improving the attractiveness of European capital markets.
BNY Mellon supports the implementation of a standardized EU-wide system for withholding tax relief at source. We believe that that this is a necessary feature of a European Capital Markets Union. Accordingly, we support Policy Option 2. However, Policy Option 2 should be complemented by Policy Option 3, as any effective common system of relief at source will need to be founded on extensive exchanges of information.
BNY Mellon welcomes the CSDR REFIT Proposal adopted by the European Commission. We believe that the Proposal introduces important and necessary changes to CSDR. Yet we also believe that the Proposal has some gaps, and can be improved.
BNY Mellon welcomes the planned review of CSDR. We believe that CSDR has played an important role in the development of safe and efficient financial market infrastructure in Europe, and that there is scope to modify CSDR in order for the objectives of CSDR to be met in a more effective and efficient manner.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put BNY Mellon next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 90.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from BNY Mellon’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.