We welcome the ECs review of the SFDR and support its objective of simplification, with a renewed focus on products and retail investors. Our position is grounded in market experience and direct feedback from clients across Europe. The introduction of a three-category product framework offers an opportunity to improve decision-useful disclosures and enhance comparability.
BlackRock
Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 51436554494-18
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #236 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Association Francaise de la Gestion financiere (AFG)
- Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA)
- Association of Luxembourg Funds Industry (ALFI)
- Assogestioni →
- Bruegel
- Bundesverband Investment und Asset Management (BVI)
- The Dutch Fund and Asset Management Association (Dufas)
- Eumedion →
- EUROFI
- European Capital Markets Institute (ECMI)
- European parliamentary financial services forum (EPFSF)
- European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA)
- and 6 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- New York, United states
- EU office
- Amsterdam
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track BlackRock in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at BlackRock? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
BlackRock filed 4 positions between 30 May 2025 and 2 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
We welcome the opportunity to provide input. This is a chance to improve clarity around sustainable investments and support investor decisions. We suggest the following principles to guide this process: Product distributors, such as wealth managers, advisers etc., have stressed the importance of a stable regime to support long-term product development, build trust, and avoid investor confusion - all critical to…
BlackRock welcomes the MISP as an important step toward deepening EU capital markets, strengthening the SIU for European investors, and supporting growth and competition. A well-calibrated framework can enhance competitiveness and facilitate cross-border investment while maintaining strong investor protection. Passporting upon authorisation is a very welcome step toward a more seamless fund passport.
We welcome the Savings and Investment Union initiative that empowers citizens to invest in their future, channel capital into EU businesses and enhance the depth, effectiveness and connectivity of EU capital markets.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 3 files in common
- French Banking Federation · 3 files in common
- ABI - Italian Banking Association · 3 files in common
- DUFAS · 3 files in common
- INREV · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 52.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from BlackRock’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.