NGO · Sweden
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track BirdLife in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at BirdLife Sweden? so we know who speaks for it.
BirdLife Sweden filed 3 positions between 14 Dec 2021 and 11 Jul 2024, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
BirdLife Sweden sees a huge need for EU legislation to be strengthened through the Commission’s proposed Forest Monitoring Framework (FML). An extremely clear example of this need is the recent compilation of Swedish primary forests by the Swedish authorities (see Annex).
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Sweden is clearly one of the countries that needs strong guidance, and most likely punishments, for not living up to its LULUCF obligations. Our national targets will certainly not be met, and the government has even presented actions to make them even harder to reach (e.g. by lowering gasoline prices).
In Sweden, the EPA has now included the American mink on the national list of invasive alien species. Control measures are already being carried out today, but in the future the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the county administrative boards intend to step up work — not least in the Swedish archipelago and on islands where damage is often greatest, and where the mink is less likely to recur.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put BirdLife Sweden next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 21.
Everything on this page comes from BirdLife Sweden’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.