Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at BirdLife Sweden? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
BirdLife Sweden filed 2 positions between 4 Feb 2024 and 11 Jul 2024, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
BirdLife Sweden sees a huge need for EU legislation to be strengthened through the Commission’s proposed Forest Monitoring Framework (FML). An extremely clear example of this need is the recent compilation of Swedish primary forests by the Swedish authorities (see Annex).
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Sweden is clearly one of the countries that needs strong guidance, and most likely punishments, for not living up to its LULUCF obligations. Our national targets will certainly not be met, and the government has even presented actions to make them even harder to reach (e.g. by lowering gasoline prices).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from BirdLife Sweden’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.