Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BS

BirdLife Sverige

NGO · Sweden

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track BirdLife in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at BirdLife Sverige? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files BirdLife Sverige engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from BirdLife Sverige or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

BirdLife Sverige filed 2 positions between 30 Sept 2025 and 1 Apr 2026, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Roadmap towards Nature Creditsfiled 30 Sept 2025source

Our society’s economy and survival are both dependent on ecosystem services, which are becoming more threatened every day. The EU natural credit roadmap shows a large funding gap for biodiversity. At the same time, harmful subsidies for bioenergy from high nature value forests contribute to forest degradation and loss of soil carbon sinks.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 1 Apr 2026source

Whereas compliance with the DNSH principle is significantly neglected and needs to be significantly increased in the next MFF; Activities should be approved/rejected on the basis of whether they involve significant harm (and therefore do not qualify for EU funding) or whether they are expected to have such a limited environmental impact that EU funding can be granted.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put BirdLife Sverige next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 15.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from BirdLife Sverige’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.