Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BV

Bioland e.V.

Industry association · Germany

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Bioland in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Bioland e.V.

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Bioland e.V.? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Bioland e.V. filed 2 positions between 30 Jul 2025 and 2 Apr 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Amending certain CAP Regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties (Omnibus III)filed 30 Jul 2025source

The Organic Farmers’ Association welcomes the objectives of the CAP simplification package and, above all, the proposals concerning organic farming. The recognition of organically certified holdings as meeting the GAEC standards is explicitly positively assessed.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Interim evaluation of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) within the 2021–2027 budgetfiled 2 Apr 2026source

1. Administrative burden and simplification The introduction of the nationally uniform, 100 % EU-funded organic schemes is expressly to be welcomed. In practice, however, the combination of these eco-schemes with nationally and regionally co-financed agriculture, environment and climate measures (AECM, EAFRD, organic premium) leads to considerable complexity.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Bioland e.V. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Bioland e.V.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.