Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
AVE

AVEPA

Public authority · Italy

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track AVEPA in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at AVEPA? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file AVEPA engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from AVEPA or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

AVEPA filed 2 positions on 31 Mar 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 31 Mar 2026source

The purpose of the DNSH principle is to ensure that the investments financed do not cause significant harm to the six environmental objectives defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. There are currently no ‘amount thresholds’ below which the DNSH does not apply; evaluation is mandatory for aid and investments of any size, but the complexity of the documentation varies depending on the type of intervention.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 31 Mar 2026source

The purpose of the DNSH principle is to ensure that the investments financed do not cause significant harm to the six environmental objectives defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. There are currently no ‘amount thresholds’ below which the DNSH does not apply; evaluation is mandatory for aid and investments of any size, but the complexity of the documentation varies depending on the type of intervention.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from AVEPA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.