We support the careful use of technology in meat inspection, including remote tools and computer-based systems, where these enhance official controls and improve flexibility in low-capacity slaughterhouses and game-handling establishments. However, any amendment to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/624 must preserve the central role, responsibility and professional judgement of the Official Veterinarian (OV).
AGV
Association of Government Vets (EASVO)
Industry association · United Kingdom
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Association in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Association of Government Vets (EASVO)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Association of Government Vets (EASVO) filed 2 positions on 25 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
The Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE) supports the modernisation of official controls under Regulation (EU) 2019/627, including the use of remote inspection, digital tools, and increased operational flexibility. However, these changes must not weaken the effectiveness, independence, or reliability of meat inspection systems, which are fundamental to public health, animal health, and animal welfare.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Association of Government Vets (EASVO) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Association of Government Vets (EASVO)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.