The draft will not lead to broader application and greater market acceptance of the EU taxonomy with regard to property financing, environmental objective climate change mitigation and the activities 7.1, 7.2 and 7.7.
Association of German Pfandbriefbanks (vdp)
Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 60762921532-05
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #808 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Der vdp ist Mitglied des:
- Europäischen Hypothekenverbandes (EHV)
- European Covered Bond Council (ECBC)
- Der Verband ist Mitglied der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Immobilienwirtschaft Deutschlands
- Der Verband arbeitet auch mit den anderen deutschen kreditwirtschaftlichen Spitzenverbänden in der Arbeitsgemeinschaf…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Verband deutscher Pfandbriefbanken e.V. (vdp)
- Head office
- Berlin, Germany
- EU office
- Brüssel
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Association in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Association of German Pfandbriefbanks (vdp)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Association of German Pfandbriefbanks (vdp) filed 4 positions between 11 Mar 2026 and 29 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
We welcome the European Commissions Call for Evidence on the Housing Simplification Package. The review of existing European regulations provides an important opportunity to remove barriers to the creation and modernisation of housing, whilst at the same time improving coherence between housing policy objectives and the European regulatory framework.
We welcome the Communication, as it correctly identifies weaknesses in the existing regulatory framework. However, the Communication remains relatively general in outlining problem areas and possible courses of action and thus falls short of developing the concrete solutions that would have been desirable. To achieve tangible improvements within a reasonable timeframe, we advocate a two-stage legislative approach.
The Association of German Pfandbrief Banks (vdp) welcomes the European Commissions review of EU banking competitiveness, emphasising that regulation has become a key factor in competitiveness. Although post-crisis reforms have strengthened resilience, the increasingly complex regulatory landscape, characterised by overlapping responsibilities, expanding supervisory expectations and high operational burdens, has…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Association of German Pfandbriefbanks (vdp) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 41.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Association of German Pfandbriefbanks (vdp)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.