Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
AAR

Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks

Industry association · Austria · EU Transparency Register LIVR-00162not in register snapshot

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Association in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks filed 3 positions between 22 Feb 2022 and 9 Aug 2023, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2022 · 1 filed2023 · 2 filed

What they argued

Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulationfiled 22 Feb 2022source

The Austrian Raiffeisen Banking Group (RBG) basically appreciates the determination of the European Commission to increase the resilience of the EU banking sector by continuously implementing the Basel III framework in a step-by-step approach. However, we would like to raise the attention to specific elements of the EC's legislative proposal on ‘Basel IV’.

Deposit protection, use of deposit guarantee schemes funds, cross-border cooperation, and transparencyfiled 9 Aug 2023PDFsource

We fully support the objective to strengthen depositor protection and confidence as stated in the Commission's draft legislation. However, the path taken by the EC to achieve these aims is the wrong one. 1. Treatment of IPS The starting point for the Commission to revise the CMDI framework in terms of the treatment of Institutional Protection Schemes (IPS) is the Eurogroup Statement of 16 June 2022.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 15.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Association of Austrian Raiffeisenbanks’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.