not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Work at Asociace provozovatelů mobilních sítí? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Asociace provozovatelů mobilních sítí filed 2 positions between 9 Jun 2025 and 11 Jul 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Digital Networks Act – Call for evidence for an evaluation and impact assessment Response from APMS (Association of Mobile Network Operators), Czech Republic Prague, 11th July 2025 The APMS appreciates the opportunity to contribute to the European Commission's Call for evidence under the Digital Networks Act initiative which builds on the Commission’s White Paper: “How to master Europe’s digital infrastructure…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Please find enclosed the feedback from the APMS (the Association of Mobile Network Operators), which brings together the three largest mobile operators in the Czech Republic. We strongly oppose giving ENISA additional powers in the field of vendor screening. In the Czech Republic, several state institutions already have this power.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Asociace provozovatelů mobilních sítí next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Asociace provozovatelů mobilních sítí’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
