Directive 2014/45/EC on the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles:(2/2) 6. ADAS ADAS systems are making vehicle safer to the point that some of them are already mandatory. In order to maintain their advantages and to prevent malfunctions once the driver relies on them, their status need to be checked. - OBD testing is needed to assess the correct software version and system status.
APP
Applus+
Company · Spain
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Applus+ in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Applus+? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Applus+ filed 3 positions between 29 Oct 2021 and 6 Jun 2024, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 2 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
Directive 2014/45/EC on the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles: 1. Performance and supervision standardization. Accreditation of testing centres under Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council should not constitute an obligation for the Member States.
Three suggestions (food for thoughts) Aggregation of the SPVD and PED In several Member States, the number of Notified Bodies for the SPVD is limited. In the Netherlands, only one authority has been designated for this Directive. The size of the market makes it unprofitable for many parties to be accredited and designated for this Directive as well.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Applus+ next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Applus+’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.