APEP, the European Potash Producers Association, representing the potash mining sector and fertilizer industry in the EU, welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions call for evidence on a Circular Economy Act for Europe.
APE
APEP
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 749896930059-45
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #630 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
- APEP is not affiliated to any association
- federation
- netowork or other body
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Association des Producteurs Europeens de Potasse (APEP)
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track APEP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at APEP? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
APEP filed 5 positions between 3 Feb 2020 and 7 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
2020 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
APEP explicitly supports the aim to limit global warming to 2°Celsius, especially against the background that a major part of the world potash production is used for the cultivation of agricultural crops. The cultivation of agricultural crops will be the commercial sector that will suffer most from climate change.
The European Association of Potash Producers (APEP), representing EU potash producers, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence on the revision of benchmark values for the free allocation of emission allowances (20262030). For the potash sector, which relies primarily on heat and fuel fallback benchmarks, this revision is of particular importance.
The European Potash Producers Association (APEP) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to simplify administrative requirements under environmental legislation while maintaining high environmental standards.
We welcome the opportunity to provide input to the Commissions evaluation of the Fertilising Products Regulation (FPR). 1. Effectiveness The FPR has achieved important progress in broadening the scope of fertilising products covered and establishing harmonised safety thresholds, thereby improving environmental and health protection compared to Regulation 2003/2003.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put APEP next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 197.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from APEP’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.