Anglo American welcomes the European Commissions initiative to update and simplify the organic framework under Regulation (EU) 2018/848 and its implementing provisions. We support the objective of ensuring that organic farmers across the EU have access to a coherent, innovation-friendly system for the authorisation of products and substances compatible with organic production, in line with the EUs Organic Action…
AA
Anglo American
Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 932483333204-67
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #358 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€600K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Eurometaux (European Metals as of 1 January 2026)
- Hydrogen Europe →
- Euromines →
- European Precious Metals Federation
- European Business Tax Forum
- Forum for the Future of Agriculture
- International Copper Association (Global)
- Nickel Institute (Global)
- International Platinum Group Metals Association (Global)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- London, United kingdom
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Anglo in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Anglo American? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Anglo American filed 2 positions between 19 Sept 2025 and 18 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Thank you for the opportunity to feedback on the performance of the Fertilising Products Regulation. While the Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 has been successful in enabling harmonization across the EU for the CE-mark framework and for new product categories like biostimulants and soil improvers, we believe it has inadvertently created an uneven playing field for manufacturers of chemically unmodified natural mineral…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Confederazione Nazionale Coldiretti · 2 files in common
- Gobierno de Canarias · 2 files in common
- IFOAM Organics Europe · 2 files in common
- Euroseeds · 2 files in common
- European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 7.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Anglo American’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.