The revision of the SFDR Regulation represents a crucial moment for the evolution of sustainable finance in Europe. Anasf the National Association of Financial Advisors in Italy has expressed proactive positions in the context of the European debate, highlighting both operational criticalities and areas for regulatory improvement.
ANA
Anasf
Industry association · Italy · EU Transparency Register 019623738105-69
6
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #292 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2020
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Anasf aderisce da molti anni al Fecif, la Federazione Europea dei Consulenti e Intermediari finanziari, che è stata c…
- La Federazione promuove il settore della consulenza finanziaria in ambito UE e favorisce la comunicazione e gli scamb…
- Anasf dal 2011 ha avviato una collaborazione con il Forum per la Finanza Sostenibile, un’Associazione senza scopo di…
- Anasf e Confesercenti hanno siglato il 27 luglio 2021 un protocollo politico di intesa, con l’obiettivo di valorizzar…
- Anasf nel 2002 ha fondato EFPA ITALIA che mira a promuovere elevati standard formativi, attraverso certificazioni e p…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- ASSOCIAZIONE NAZIONALE CONSULENTI FINANZIARI (ANASF)
- Head office
- Milano, Italy
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Anasf in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Anasf? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Anasf filed 6 positions between 21 May 2025 and 31 Mar 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
2025 · 2 filed2026 · 4 filed
What they argued
We welcome the approach aimed at promoting greater regulatory uniformity in the European market through the transition from a directive to a regulation. This choice appears consistent with the objective of ensuring more effective harmonisation of regulated activities throughout the Union, reducing differences in interpretation and application between Member States.
We welcome the approach aimed at promoting greater regulatory uniformity in the European market through the transition from a directive to a regulation. This choice appears consistent with the objective of ensuring more effective harmonisation of regulated activities throughout the Union, reducing differences in interpretation and application between Member States.
ANASF welcomes the European Commission's initiative to develop rules that promote market integration and more efficient supervision. We believe that, in order to achieve this goal, it is essential to address the obstacles that still prevent a truly competitive and open capital market. The main obstacles faced by financial advisors are of a fiscal and legislative nature.
The fact that certain issues regarding PEPPs have been acknowledged is certainly a positive development; however, the proposal as a whole remains unsatisfactory. The product should be much more accessible, especially for young people and for workers who move frequently between different countries. Furthermore, significant concerns remain regarding the overall structure of the initiative.
The proposed revision of the IORP II and IDD directives is part of a process aimed at progressively strengthening European supervisory authorities, a move that nevertheless raises significant concerns. The transfer of powers from Member States to the European level risks upsetting the institutional balance and reducing the scope for national autonomy, with potential implications for democratic legitimacy as well.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ABI - Italian Banking Association · 5 files in common
- DUFAS · 5 files in common
- Deutsches Aktieninstitut e.V. · 5 files in common
- INVERCO · 5 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 63.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Anasf’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.