Trade union · France
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Agricultrice in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Agricultrice? so we know who speaks for it.
Agricultrice filed 4 positions between 18 Oct 2023 and 12 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
I am in favour of a specification with strict standards to avoid all the externalities of agriculture, such as the disappearance of insects, birds, landscapes and widespread contamination of drinking resources. For animal welfare. For a carbon balance of negative farms and full autonomy. What the European Commission is proposing should be stopped by relaxing the organic specification.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
In organic farming, I do not understand why to revise the regulation now, when it is not the urgency of our professions and I see only a negative interest in our professions. The urgency is that we can live dignified from our job, have fair pay, do not exhaust ourselves and be healthy. With regard to the relevance of this revision: Why review it so early?
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
I think that levelling the rules down will not work in our favour. Consumers already feel harmed by large-scale organic food. Let’s set an example. Moreover, if regulation is weakened, new labels will be created. Let’s support what exists.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
GMOs are subject to strict and largely justified EU regulation, NBT or NGTs must not escape it either. The arguments of industrialists as to why they, by their different method, are not GMOs are unfounded. European Directive 2001/18 defines a ‘genetically modified organism (GMO)’ on the basis of the technique by which it was created.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Agricultrice next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 18.
Everything on this page comes from Agricultrice’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.