not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
I believe that organic farming is the future of our planet. It is necessary to stay on human scales and respect the basic needs of the animals. Ruminants need to leave and graze, poultry need space and also to leave. All animals need to be able to go out in a natural environment! I think it is also important to respect what nature does, and not always seek to change it. New GMOs should be banned!
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
As a farmer, this project seems to me to be an important opportunity to respond to the environmental challenges facing European agriculture in the 21st century. Genetic innovation is a major bias for reducing plant protection products in the future, while ensuring the productivity and competitiveness necessary for the survival of our farms, in the face of unfair competition imposed by non-EU countries.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
It seems to me that it is important to continue research on genetics in order to address future environmental and climate issues. Moreover, technologies used today in agriculture allow us to grow plants such as sunflower, in places or it would be impossible without casual, cutting this technological lead would still lag behind us globally and catch up for the lost time will be impossible.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Agriculteur next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Agriculteur’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.