Agbiz makes this submission on behalf of the South African agri-food export sector, focusing on the conditions for using recyclate from third countries (Article 7(10)) and the sustainability criteria for recycling technologies (Article 7(9)), where the risk to agri-food trade is greatest and on which the Commission has expressly invited evidence. What is at stake.
AGB
Agbiz
Industry association · ZAF
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 655 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 655 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 655 consultation files tracked so far (56,999 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Agbiz in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Agbiz? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Agbiz filed 4 positions on 16 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 655 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
Agbiz makes this submission on behalf of the South African agri-food export sector, focusing on the conditions for using recyclate from third countries (Article 7(10)) and the sustainability criteria for recycling technologies (Article 7(9)), where the risk to agri-food trade is greatest and on which the Commission has expressly invited evidence. What is at stake.
Agbiz makes this submission on behalf of the South African agri-food export sector, focusing on the conditions for using recyclate from third countries (Article 7(10)) and the sustainability criteria for recycling technologies (Article 7(9)), where the risk to agri-food trade is greatest and on which the Commission has expressly invited evidence. What is at stake.
Agbiz makes this submission on behalf of the South African agri-food export sector, focusing on the conditions for using recyclate from third countries (Article 7(10)) and the sustainability criteria for recycling technologies (Article 7(9)), where the risk to agri-food trade is greatest and on which the Commission has expressly invited evidence. What is at stake.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Agbiz next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 105.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Agbiz’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.