Reduction of waste as well as reuse and recycling of waste are all generally important issues for development towards a sustainable society. However, it is of high importance that its not based on rigid rules. If it can be shown, e.g. by LCA that reuse or recycling of a product/material is not the best way (most sustainable) to manage a life cycle, which may be true e.g.
?
817602-9786
Academic / research · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 636181325610-12
1
position filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 156 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #101 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Swedish Forest Based Sector Research Agenda - Sweden (Process Leadership) (Part of Forest-based sector technology pla…
- EFI member (European Forest Institute). BIC BBI -associated member. EFI. IUFRO.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Registered as
- Stiftelsen Skogsbrukets Forskningsinstitut (Skogforsk)
- Head office
- Uppsala, Sweden
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track 817602-9786 in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at 817602-9786? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
817602-9786 filed 1 position on 22 Feb 2022, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put 817602-9786 next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from 817602-9786’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.