Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Revision of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA)

33 submissions from 33 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 81 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 33 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

21 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 8 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 21Civil society 8Public authorities, academia, other 4

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

12 of 33
in the EU Register
31
full-time lobbying staff
€3.5M+
declared costs a year
24
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 27 Feb 2026 — it ran from 5 Dec 2025.

Policy area
Transport (DG MOVE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Jun 2026

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence27 Feb 2026
  2. Public consultation27 Feb 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Proposal for a regulation.

33 positions · showing 25

FD

FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANE S.p.A.

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Gruppo Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane S.p.A. (FS) - website: https://www.fsitaliane.it/en.html hereby submits its contribution to the ERA Mandate Revision EC Public Consultation. Please note that FS has participated in the related Targeted Consultation, submitting both our formal responses and the attached FS Italiane Comment Paper.

LinkedInX
ID

Iarnród Éireann / Irish Rail

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

Iarnród Éireann welcomes the opportunity to submit observations on Revision of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). A subsidiary of Córas Iompair Éireann, Iarnród Éireann provides passenger and freight rail services as well as operating Rosslare Europort. Iarnród Éireann welcomes the opportunity to provide observations.

LinkedInX
U

UIP

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

While UIP co-signs and supports all the elements contained in the attached "Sector input paper for ERA Regulation Call for Evidence", we would like to add the following remarks, in the name of UIP alone: The revision of ERAs mandate, together with the implementation of the framework for common safety methods ('CSM ASLP) offer concrete opportunities to strengthen the coordinating role of ERA in order to accelerate…

LinkedInX
FT

Finnish Transport and Communication Agency, Traficom (NSA FI)

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom) is pleased to submit the attached statement in response to the European Commissions consultation on the revision of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA).

LinkedInX
EP

European Passengers' Federation

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The European Passengers' Federation (EPF) strongly supports ERA's work, whose mission is "Moving Europe towards a sustainable and safe railway system without frontiers". Since its establishment in 2004, ERA has made significant progress in strengthening rail safety and interoperability across the EU, and its technical achievements are widely recognised.

LinkedInX
ER

European Rail Freight Association (ERFA)

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The European Rail Freight Association (ERFA) is delighted to share its position on the revision of Regulation (EU) 2016/796 on the European Union's Agency for Railways. You will find attached a sector input paper co-signed by ALE, CER, EIM, ERFA, FEDECRAIL, NB-Rail, UIP, UIRR, UITP, UNIFE.

LinkedInX
NR

Norwegian Railway Union

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The Norwegian Railway union, who organizes all kind of railway workers, without drivers fully support the ETF statement regarding the ERA mandate. We like to highlight what ETF mention about the concern of removing national rules and the lack of binding rules and that the responsibility to follow the TSIs is left to the companies without any conclusion of what is safe enough.

LinkedInX
MO

Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

From the perspective of the Latvian railway sector, the main concerns regarding ERA activities relate to high certification costs and lengthy procedures for vehicle authorisations and single safety certificates. The processes are often time-consuming and difficult to predict, creating a significant administrative and financial burden for undertakings.

LinkedInX
DN

Drážní úřad

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment on the mandate of the Agency. I very much appreciate the cooperation and the opportunity to improve things. I set out the key drivers that need to be addressed and improved. These initiatives have already been addressed through official or other channels. For each initiative, we are ready to work more closely together.

Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
L

LO

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

LO Norway acknowledges that equipping European railways for better interoperability and facilitating greater mobility across borders is a good intention. We also support high ambitions for railway safety, as well as increasing the market share of the sustainable transport that railways provide.

LinkedInX
UT

UNIFE - The European Rail Industry Association

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

UNIFE - The European Rail Industry Association - welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the proposed revision of the ERA Regulation (EU) 2016/796. Attached you will find a common input paper by ALE, CER, EIM, ERFA, FEDECRAIL, NB-RAIL, UIP, UIRR, UITP and UNIFE, proposing amendments to the ERA regulation to clarify the mandate of ERA and importantly areas where sufficient resources and expertise are required.

LinkedInX
EO

Europe on Rail | Germanwatch

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Europe is facing challenges of strategic autonomy, resilience, competitiveness and decarbonisation. In response to these challenges, Europe on Rail recommends an upgraded mandate for the European Union Agency for Railways.

LinkedInX
F

Fedecrail

· · filed 27 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

Fedecrail a member of the Group of Representative Bodies, representing heritage operators, welcomes the commission review of the ERA mandate and the call for evidence. We have added our name to the GRB joint response, which we believe is a fair and reasonable set of proposals for this review for the modern railway.

LinkedInX
FP

Fundacja "Pro Kolej"

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

In the opinion of the Pro Kolej Foundation, the proposed extension of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways, while having positive effects, may also have a negative impact on the flexibility and competitiveness of the railway system.

LinkedInX
EE

EIM European Rail Infrastructure Managers

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

EIM, as the association of European rail infrastructure managers, welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the important role of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) in the context of the ongoing call for evidence on revising Regulation (EU) 2016/796.

LinkedInX
BS

Bundesarbeitskammer Österreiche

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

The Federal Chamber of Labour welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation on the future mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). The Federal Chamber of Labour is the statutory body representing the interests of more than 3.8 million employees in Austria. It is registered in the EU Transparency Register under the number 23869471911-54.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CO

Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

CER welcomes the opportunity to share the view of its members and to provide input to the European Commission before the presentation of the revised regulation. As a member of the Group of Representative Bodies (GRB), CER also signed the Joint Sector Position on the Revision.

LinkedInX
SV

Správa železnic (SZCZ)

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The Railway Administration very much welcomes the opportunity to communicate its views on streamlining the functioning of the European Railway Agency (ERA) to the European Commission as part of the process of revising Regulation 796/2016 and as part of the consultation on the revision of the ERA mandate.

Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IE

IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it

· · filed 26 Feb 2026 · source

The ERA is a key contributor to a sustainable, safe European transport system without frontiers. It issues single safety certificates to railway undertakings, vehicle authorisations and ERTMS track-side equipment approval.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AO

Association of European Rail Rolling Stock Lessors

· · filed 25 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

AERRL and ALLRAIL support the European Commissions initiative to revise Regulation (EU) 2016/796 on the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). This revision represents a key opportunity to further strengthen the Single European Railway Area, accelerate market opening, and enhance the competitiveness, sustainability and innovation capacity of the European rail sector.

LinkedInX
AA

ALLRAIL asbl

· · filed 25 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

AERRL and ALLRAIL support the European Commissions initiative to revise Regulation (EU) 2016/796 on the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). This revision represents a key opportunity to further strengthen the Single European Railway Area, accelerate market opening, and enhance the competitiveness, sustainability and innovation capacity of the European rail sector.

LinkedInX
MS

Mafex – Spanish Railway Association

· · filed 25 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The Spanish Railway Industry Association (Mafex), representing 118 companies and accounting for 83 % of SPAINS railway exports, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the revision of the mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA).

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
L

Lineas

· · filed 24 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

See also attached file. 1. Complexity of the authorisation process and rules : difficulty in identifying conditions of authorization when an update is applied on CCS, RS or software. 2. When a topic is blocking and additional inputs have to be provided, it is not always easy to understand the different options, their advantages and drawbacks.

LinkedInX
BA

ÖBB/Austrian Federal Railways

· · filed 24 Feb 2026 · source

ÖBB expressly supports the expanded role of ERA as part of the 4th Railway Package. However, experience has shown that the objectives pursued have not yet been fully achieved. This is primarily due to factors other than the legal framework of ERA Regulation (EU) 2016/796 itself.

LinkedInX
ET

European Transport Workers' Federation (ETF)

· · filed 24 Feb 2026 · source

PDF

The European Transport Workers Federation (ETF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation on the future mandate of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). The ETF is a pan-European trade union organisation which embraces transport trade unions from the European Union, the European Economic Area and Central and Eastern European countries.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 33 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.