EU consultation
11 submissions from 11 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission received 20 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 11 from organizations. Not shown: 9 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. About this data →
4 submissions from industry (companies and their trade associations) against 6 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations: a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 14 Sept 2026; it ran from 17 Aug 2026.
How it got here
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communication.
Showing 11 of 11 submissions.
· · filed 14 Sept 2026 · source
EU law enforcement data protection rules regulate the use of personal data by law enforcement and criminal justice authorities for law enforcement purposes. The rules create a high level of protection of personal data and, at the same time, allow for better data sharing between law enforcement and criminal justice authorities across the EU.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
· · filed 14 Sept 2026 · source
Foundation for Women and Family Planning (FEDERA) considers that, in the evaluation of Directive (EU) 2016/680, particular attention should be paid to the protection of health and reproductive health data processed by law enforcement authorities.
Christian Council International welcomes this opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission's second report on the application and functioning of the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive. In the attached document, CCI highlights the importance of protecting privacy and fundamental rights, ensuring proportionality in the processing of personal data and safeguarding freedom of thought, conscience and…
Please see the attached document. Key Points The EU's current LED adequacy framework is underused despite a growing need and demand for increased international law enforcement cooperation. The existing "all-or-nothing" approach to adequacy is too restrictive, effectively requiring near-complete legal equivalence and limiting cooperation with trusted international partners that nevertheless maintain strong…
The feedback focuses on whether provenance, purpose, current status and relevant processing context remain traceable as law-enforcement data are shared, corrected, restricted and used in analytical or AI-assisted workflows. It recommends preserving a clear distinction between source information, assessments or analytical inferences, and accountable institutional decisions.
· · filed 25 Aug 2026 · source
Protect my innovation & platforms by IP and PCT WIPO via 28Digital.eu Unite Experts. Let my organisations include my economy via their regulations & count my actions by generative AI & stop creating selfish events there I should be invited with fulltime efforts. Alpbach & Horizon & WIPO & Euipo TechConnect is my own project alone with ni friends and no organisation at all involved.
European Digital Rights (EDRi) welcomes the opportunity to submit its analysis of the implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive (LED), based on independent research conducted in five Member States (Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece and Slovenia).
The **Federal Association ANUAS e.V.** welcomes the possibility to participate in the evaluation of the application and functioning of the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680. From the point of view of victim support, the evaluation should not only ask whether personal data are processed formally in accordance with the law by law enforcement, judicial and supervisory authorities.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
· · filed 19 Aug 2026 · source
It is important to have a strong level of data protection in relation to law enforcement A balance has to be struck with the protection of society at large and police officers in particular: Strong data protection and effective policing are not competing objectives.
Dear Europe Commission! The Innovation from my platforms is in need of a products created in Bio-Rad Laboratories via my own clinical Holistic treatment at a dental Clinic. When I applied to inform Them about my order as sample to the new Holistic Dental Clinic and invested time in 3 years from 2024 to include Ceramic Hydroxyapatite Resin in 51 platforms as presentation for free about this solution and now patent…
· · filed 17 Aug 2026 · source
B3Heckel OÜ is an Estonian company operating as a B2B sales agency across the EU. We contact only businesses and professionals in their professional capacity never private consumers. As a small European company that lives on cross-border trade, we welcome stronger privacy and consumer trust, but we ask lawmakers to consider how the reinforced GDPR/ePrivacy rules apply to legitimate business-to-business activity.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed”. You read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.