Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Removing the obligation for farmers to record the use of plant protection products in the geospatial aid application

13 submissions from 13 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 26 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 13 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

8 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.7 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 8Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 2

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 11 Dec 2025 — it ran from 13 Nov 2025.

Policy area
Agriculture (DG AGRI)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2025

How it got here

  1. Draft implementing regulation11 Dec 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Implementing regulation.

13 positions

PE

PAN Europe

· · filed 11 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the draft proposal to remove the obligation to record plant protection products in the geospatial aid application. Maintaining the obligation to record the use of pesticides within the geo-spatial application in the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy requirements is essential, for the different reasons listed below…

LinkedInX
DB

Deutscher Bauernverband e.V.

· · filed 11 Dec 2025 · source

The German Farmers’ Association welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to remove the obligation to register plant protection products in the geospatial application. The current regime creates significant additional costs and commits resources without creating any discernible added value for the environment or administration.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
UN

Unión de Uniones de Agricultores y Ganaderos

· · filed 9 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Unión de Uniones de Agricultores y Ganaderos welcomes the possibility to comment on the draft Implementing Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2022/1173 on the integrated administration and control system of the CAP and presents the following considerations.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
O

other

· · filed 9 Dec 2025 · source

Geospatial traceability is a key element in moving towards risk-based inspection models and remote monitoring. Waiving these data in the geospatial application would limit the potential for remote sensing, advanced analysis and automation that the Commission itself promotes under the CAP.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IE

IDEE ECONOMICHE di MARCO BAVA

· · filed 8 Dec 2025 · source

Under the proposal to simplify the common agricultural policy, this initiative aims to reduce the administrative burden for farmers by removing the obligation to record plant protection products in the geospatial application. However, farmers will still need to keep records of the use of plant protection products (in digital or paper form).

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CC

Copa-Cogeca

· · filed 8 Dec 2025 · source

Copa and Cogeca welcome the initiative to remove the obligation to record plant protection products in the Geospatial Aid Application. This has been a key demand of Copa and Cogeca from the very start of discussions on the Implementing Regulation 2022/1173. This change will bring the much-needed simplification to aid application and management.

LinkedInX
CA

Cooperativa agricola nuestra señora de abona

· · filed 4 Dec 2025 · source

It makes no sense not to relate plant protection products to geospatial information; it may help initially not to have the register geospatially, but in the long run it is absolutely necessary for the future of the sector and its improvement. In our case, every year the cooperative improves its performance thanks to the automatisations we have gradually carried out, and this will be the next one we will implement.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AS

Atria san isidro

· · filed 4 Dec 2025 · source

As a technician in a cooperative of more than 300 members, I am tired that the farmer thinks that agricultural technicians have to manage all the information. I am in favour of digital plant protection products and their incorporation so that the farmer starts gradually digitalising. If we do not move forward with the transformation of the sector, we will be trapped in the past.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
O

osigris

· · filed 4 Dec 2025 · source

Digitalisation has helped all sectors to significantly increase their cost-effectiveness, performance and speed. We are aware that the agricultural sector is an ageing sector, but that is not why its digitalisation should be halted. The use of plant protection products digitally in a geo-spatial environment would greatly help to increase the recognition of potential present and future problems.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
B

Boerenbond

· · filed 3 Dec 2025 · source

Dear Sir/Madam, thank you for considering this proposal. Unfortunately, we note that there are still a lot of obligations that could be implemented together with this simplification. We would like to raise the bar in order to achieve administrative simplification up to the level of the individual farm. This proposal does not yet address this.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
U

Upa

· · filed 3 Dec 2025 · source

This is an initiative in the right direction, it makes no sense, in my view, to further collapse the process of processing CAP aid with redundant and non-key information in the application process. The single application (geo-spatial application) is a complex and delicate procedure that cannot be overloaded with information that is not essential for the management of CAP aid.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AP

ASAJA PALENCIA

· · filed 24 Nov 2025 · source

This simplification has been one of the constant demands on European and national mobilisation in the sector, resulting in the fact that the only administrative simplifications that have been implemented so far concern non-professional farmers who do not reach 10 ha, and therefore a reduction in the number of checks to be carried out by the administration.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AS

ASAJA Soria

· · filed 17 Nov 2025 · source

Fully agree with Antonio Caro. Apologise for not having any time to reply or elaborate on the reply. Moreover, the above is sufficient, unfortunately, all the current registration obligations no longer leave us time to be able to deal with these cases more extensively.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 13 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.