Stakeholder Response to the European Commission Publication and invitation to comment on the “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants (recast)” Please find formal letter response appended as an attachment.
EU consultation · In Force
Recast of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation
9 submissions from 8 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission received 11 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 9 from organizations. Not shown: 1 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 1 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →
Who showed up
9 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 17 May 2018 — it ran from 22 Mar 2018.
- Policy area
- Sustainability (DG ENV)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Legislative stage
- In Force
- Commission reference
- COM(2018)144
How it got here
- Proposal for a regulation17 May 2018
Showing 9 of 9 submissions.
1-3 Strand London WC2N 5EH T: 01926 655 077 www.nationalgrid.com Ref. Ares(2018)2581596 - 17/05/2018 Steve Thompson Directorate-General for Environment European Commission Environment Sustainability Manager National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA [email removed] 17 May 2018 Dear Sirs, COM(2018)144 – Commission proposal for a Recast of the Regulation on Persistent Organic Pollutants…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
POSITION PAPER MARCH 2017 The European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) views the Recast of the Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation as an opportunity for the EU to improve its approach to the nomination of new substances under the Stockholm Convention.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Cefic welcome the EU POP Recast proposal and the opportunity to provide comment. Those comments are presented in the attached files. The 2018 updated position paper based on the Recast proposal issued earlier this year, completes the position paper shared last year on the draft Recast proposal available at that time.
ASD would like to thank the European Commission for giving the opportunity to stakeholders to provide feedback on this proposal, as part of implementing the Commission's Better Regulation Agenda. ASD would like to outline the key specificities of the aerospace and defence sectors and propose improvement areas in order to enhance the functioning of the POP regulation within the various EU chemicals legislation.
EnvC 48/18 Comments on EC proposal for a Regulation on Persistent Organic Pollutants (recast) 17 May 2018 About Energy UK Energy UK is the trade association for the GB energy industry with a membership of over 100 suppliers, generators, and stakeholders with a business interest in the production and supply of electricity and gas for domestic and business consumers.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
bvse-Bundesverband Sekundärrohstoffe und Entsorgung e.V., Germany
· · filed 17 May 2018 · source
Federal Association for Secondary Raw Materials and Waste Management, Germany: Statement on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on persistent organic pollutants (recast) COM (2018) 144 final 2018/0070 (COD) The Federal Association for Secondary Raw Materials and Waste Management (bvse) has following comments on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the…
ECPA supports the recast of the POPs regulation, however clarity on the process of how ECHA will be involved in the process of evaluating an potential POP candidate substance still needs to be clarified, whether one of the existing ECHA scientific committees will have oversight and whether a public consultation be agreed to enable stakeholder the opportunity to comment on any POP proposal.
l'Union nationale des journalistes de l'Ukraine
· · filed 4 Apr 2018 · source
It is worth it would have to request and analyse the functioning of an ANNEX to Commission Directive 2014/80/EU of 20 June 2014 amending Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration, more precisely part C “Information to be provided by Member States with regard to the pollutants and their indicators for which…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.