12 submissions from 12 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 121 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 12 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
2 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 4 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 2Civil society 4Public authorities, academia, other 6
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 10 Apr 2026 — it ran from 13 Jan 2026.
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Sept 2026 · in 31 days
How it got here
Call for evidence · impact assessment16 Jul 2025
Public consultation10 Apr 2026
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Prop dir.
We support the European Commission’s ambition to revise Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA and adapt it to the challenges of the 21st century. At the same time, we enclose some recommendations that can lead to greater legal certainty, more effective cross-border cooperation and more effective sanctioning of organised crime in all its current forms.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Contribution to the Commissions Call for Evidence: Advancing the Fight Against Drugs and Illicit Trafficking through Proven Technological Solutions Organised crimefuelled heavily by drug traffickingremains one of the most urgent cross-border threats facing the European Union.
We are glad to offer our irl on ground contribution to EU. According to most recent legal proceedings all throughout Europe, we are facing an unprecedented rise in criminal organisations called in English speaking countries cults, sects in most EU countries as well as their new evolution into sectarian phenomenons or cultic drifts as we generically call them #Sectarianism including esoteric and occultist groups.
The municipality of Baarle-Nassau welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to review and revise Framework Decision 2008/841/JBZ. From our responsibility as a border municipality and as an active partner in the administrative approach to undermining, we are happy to contribute to this consultation. Please find our feedback in the annex.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
The Province of Noord-Brabant welcomes the initiative of the European Commission to review and revise Framework Decision 2008/841/JBZ. As an active partner in the administrative approach to undermining and given our experience as a border region, the province of North Brabant is happy to contribute to this consultation. Please find our feedback in the annex.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
The City of Amsterdam welcomes the European Commissions initiative to review the EU framework for combating organised crime. As a metropolitan city, Amsterdam is at the forefront of both the manifestations and the consequences of organised criminal activity, particularly in the context of illicit drug markets, financial crime and criminal money flows infiltrating legitimate sectors.
Die GdP, Europas größte Polizeigewerkschaft mit über 209.000 Mitgliedern und Teil des Dachverbands EU.Pol, begrüßt die geplante Überarbeitung des Rahmenbeschlusses 2008/841/JI als wichtigen Schritt zur Bekämpfung organisierter Kriminalität in Europa.
1. Inleiding De gemeenten Enschede, Losser en Stadt Gronau gelegen in de Nederlands-Duitse grensregio, bevinden zich op een strategisch kruispunt van georganiseerde criminaliteit. Door hun ligging, bestuurlijke daadkracht en opgebouwde expertise in grensoverschrijdende samenwerking, zijn zij bij uitstek geschikt als proeftuin en partner voor Europese beleidsontwikkeling op het gebied van veiligheid en ondermijning.
This call for evidence arises from a research project examining the role and responsibilities of EU agencies, national authorities, and civil society in protecting migrants vulnerable to human trafficking (Sonia Morano-Foadi and Matilde Ventrella). The findings highlight a persistent failure to prioritise victim protection, with an overwhelming focus on border control and anti-smuggling efforts.
EU.Pol is the biggest European Federation of Police Unions. We represent 310.000 police officers. And even we welcome all these actions we feel that the police officers as a person are often forgotten in these thematics. Making sure that police officers feel well and protected while executing there difficult and highly dangerous tasks will improve the quality of law enforcement drastically.
European Confederation of Police contribution to the consultation on Fighting organised crime New EU rules The European Confederation of Police (EuroCOP), representing the voice of police officers across 25 European countries, welcomes the European Commissions intention to revise and strengthen the EUs legal and strategic framework to fight organised crime.
Fight against organised crime Proposal for a directive Title: From complaint to closure: simulated business structures, missing traceability and institutional damage in the EU. Author: [name removed] Egea Technical Judicial Perito Global3CCS (Canary Islands, Spain) Labour Inspectorate: E/35-[phone removed] I am submitting this contribution as a European citizen, an accredited judicial expert and a direct complainant…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.