1 submissions from 1 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 54 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 1 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
NextFeedback on adopted proposal open: Proposal for a new Regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) — closes 24 Oct 2026
Deliberations in Council working party · 9 Jul 2026
Adoption of legislative proposal by the Commission · 25 Jun 2026
Public consultation closed: Proposal for a new Regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) — 34 responses · 15 Jan 2026
Call for evidence closed: Proposal for a new Regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) — 17 responses · 31 Jul 2025
Who showed up
0 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 0Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 0
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation is open — 55 days leftto submit. It closes on 24 Oct 2026.
Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.
European Confederation of Police, proposed amendments on articles; Add new paragraph in article 7 on Strategic analytical support : Europol shall include in its strategic analytical products an assessment of organised violence, intimidation and serious threats directed against law enforcement officers whenever such phenomena are linked to organised crime, terrorism or criminal activities with a hybrid dimension .2.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.