Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2026/0164(COD) · Commission Proposal

New Eurojust Regulation

3 submissions from 3 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 5 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 3 from organizations. Not shown: 2 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. About this data →

Committee LIBERapporteur Francisco Assis (S&D)Next Feedback on adopted proposal open: Eurojust Regulation Revision , closes 04 Nov 2026
  1. Deliberations in Council working party · 7 Oct 2026
  2. Deliberations in Council · 2 Oct 2026
  3. Deliberations in Coreper · 23 Sept 2026
  4. Deliberations in Council working party · 16 Sept 2026
  5. Referred to Committee · 14 Sept 2026

Who showed up

0 submissions from industry (companies and their trade associations) against 2 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 0Civil society 2Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations: a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation is open: 21 days left to submit. It closes on 4 Nov 2026.

Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Commission Proposal
Lead committee
LIBE
Commission reference
COM(2026)570

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment3 Dec 2025
  2. Public consultation24 Feb 2026
  3. Proposal for a regulation4 Nov 2026 · upcoming

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 3 of 3 submissions.

DE

DigitalTrade4.EU

· · filed 9 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

We support the Commissions objective of strengthening Eurojusts analytical, proactive and cross-border cooperation capabilities, including improved interoperability and automated hit/no-hit information exchange with Europol, the EPPO and OLAF. The proposal correctly recognises that more efficient information exchange and digital tools are essential for serious cross-border crime investigations.

LinkedInX
FI

Fundatia International Justice Mission Bucharest

· · filed 9 Sept 2026 · source

International Justice Mission (IJM) welcomes the proposed revision of the Eurojust Regulation and supports the objective of strengthening judicial cooperation in response to increasingly complex forms of serious and organized cross-border crime.

LinkedInX

Comments from the Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. on the revision of the Eurojust Regulation on co-victims’ rights in cross-border homicides The BV ANUAS e.V. welcomes the possibility of commenting on the planned revision of the Eurojust Regulation. ANUAS is a specialis. FR for co-victims of homicide and brings long. Expertise, advice and stakeholders from national and cross-border cases.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV: all 3 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed”. You read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.