Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Implementing Regulation on AI Regulatory Sandboxes

18 submissions from 18 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 33 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 18 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

9 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 9Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 6

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 13 Jan 2026 — it ran from 2 Dec 2025.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2026

How it got here

  1. Draft implementing regulation13 Jan 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Implementing regulation.

18 positions

AO

Alum of Cambridge University

· · filed 13 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

It is vital for start-ups to work directly with the regulatory Office over the AI regulatory sandboxes. Although the solution would require additional resources on the side of the regulatory such approach would stimulate greater operational flexibility of the start-ups (and SMEs in general) and assure scalability of their businesses in the long run. Therefore point 4.5 would provide more clarity on this issue.

LinkedInX
D

DIGITALEUROPE

· · filed 13 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Please find attached detailed comments, and below our key observations and recommendations on the draft implementing act on AI regulatory sandboxes: - Regulatory sandboxes should operate with harmonised processes, uniform treatment and predictable outcomes across the EU. The European AI Board should receive a clear mandate to coordinate sandboxes and issue EU-wide guidelines, in partnership with industry.

LinkedInX
SE

Stichting ElaadNL

· · filed 13 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

AI has the potential to deliver a significant contribution to accelerating the EUs energy transition. The upcoming Strategic Roadmap for digitalization and AI in the energy sector will accelerate deployment of AI solutions in the energy system and stimulate research.

LinkedInX
AS

Aena S.M.E., S.A.

· · filed 13 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Aena encourages the Commission to ensure that the final wording of the Regulation is sufficiently ambitious to maximise the impact of sandboxes as real catalysts for innovation. This means ensuring that sandboxes are not limited to experimental spaces, but act as effective platforms for validation, technology transfer and scaling of innovative solutions in the European market.

LinkedInX
P

Platformable

· · filed 12 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Platformable welcomes the opportunity to respond to the consultation process on AI regulatory sandboxes rules for their set-up and operation. We work with enterprises, SMEs, startups, industry associations, standards bodies, and non-profit organisations on open digital ecosystems in which everyone can participate and co-create their own value.

LinkedInX
AV

Access VetMed

· · filed 12 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Access VetMed welcomes the Commissions initiative to establish harmonised rules for AI regulatory sandboxes as a useful framework for the development, testing and validation of AI-based solutions in health, including animal health. Our feedback to the consultation on the Draft Implementing Regulation is attached.

LinkedInX
AI

appliedAI Institute for Europe gGmbH

· · filed 12 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

This response addresses six areas where the draft implementing act would benefit from strengthening: a new chapter on establishment; access and selection criteria; sandbox plan; mandatory dissemination of learnings; structured cooperation with EU initiatives; and timely availability of standardised templates. First, the draft lacks concrete provisions on establishment of AI Regulatory Sandboxes.

LinkedInX
PD

Pharma Deutschland e.V.

· · filed 12 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Pharma Deutschland welcomes the establishment of common rules governing the creation, development, implementation, operation and supervision of AI regulatory sandboxes. We particularly support the objectives of these sandboxes, namely to enhance legal certainty for innovators, facilitate regulatory compliance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, promote responsible innovation and competitiveness, and accelerate the…

LinkedInX
IE

IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it

· · filed 9 Jan 2026 · source

The AI Act offers providers the possibility to develop, train, validate and test their innovative AI systems for a limited period of time under regulatory supervision in a controlled framework established by a competent authority. AI regulatory sandboxes help achieve the AI Act’s objective of fostering innovation and compliance.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
TP

Techno Polis

· · filed 8 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

Regulatory sandboxes have evolved into pivotal governance instruments designed to bridge the gap between accelerating innovation and legal stability. While the draft successfully establishes a harmonized framework for AI experimentation within the Union, it can be further strengthened by adopting "second-generation" sandbox tools - such as accelerated entry mechanisms and digital synthetic testing - to better align…

LinkedInX
N

Numalis

· · filed 6 Jan 2026 · source

This opinion is the result of joint work involving: * Arnault Ioualalen, Numalis, AI SMEs and standardisation expert (the tenderer for this opinion on behalf of the group) * Anne Laurent, Professor and Vice-President of the University of Montpellier * Romaric Redon, Director of the ANITI programme * Pierre Trilles, Director of Mission in the Occitanie Region.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
MK

Mākslīgā Intelekta Latvijas Asociācija

· · filed 5 Jan 2026 · source

PDF

The comments reflect the practical experience of members of the Latvian Association of Artificial Intelligence in developing, deploying and ensuring compliance with AI solutions. The proposals aim to promote responsible innovation and effective application of regulation in practice.

Filed in Latvian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
WS

WIBU-SYSTEMS AG

· · filed 4 Jan 2026 · source

While welcoming the objective of AI regulatory sandboxes to enhance legal certainty and support innovation, it will be important to ensure that their practical operation does not inadvertently favor larger players or more resource-intensive ecosystems.

LinkedInX
GT

GMVV Think Tank

· · filed 28 Dec 2025 · source

AI regulatory sandboxes should be framed as more than a safe test environment for innovators. They are also an institutional learning instrument. As argued in the Cambridge Forum paper AI: Law and Governance - Regulatory sandboxes for AI in the majority world: A learning-centric approach to legal adaptation, the value is two-sided: providers learn how to achieve compliance and manage risks, while authorities learn…

LinkedInX

New regenerative era in Medicine & Medical Devices via all kind of municipalites & Governments via digital platforms of study Circle leaders & innovators creating IP innovations Will easily be empowered via geverative AI & great actions & data from established process & organisations plus members will be seen & give value to any project & innovation as addition to basic support created via SME funds & missed incomes…

LinkedInX

Germanys media authorities expressly welcome the fact that AI regulatory sandboxes can be established not only horizontally, but also in specific sectors, particularly in the media sector, as well as at regional and local level. It is crucial that these structures are integrated in and interoperable to the existing independent system of media regulation.

LinkedInX
HU

Halmstad University

· · filed 11 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

I have been studying new frameworks for public and private collaborations during my PhD, and I have developed a white paper on the topic focused on such collaborations within the European Union context, given current policies. I hereby share my white paper as a way to contribute to the development of new collaborative frameworks such as the Regulatory Sandboxes.

LinkedInX
TG

The Good Lobby HUB Spain

· · filed 2 Dec 2025 · source

PDF

Include innovation IP as it is ready PCT service & WIPO & Euipo are ready to act systematic via regulations & the innovation is perfect solutions to talk about with Rich Governments to support 36 years study Circle Sustainable Open Studio 2012 & help all companies. I need to be included in Spain there WIN Stramann Space & The Good Lobby HUB Spain Can protect my rights via their researchers & team.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 18 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.