Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Follow-up to the European Citizens’ Initiative “Fur Free Europe”

118 submissions from 106 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 830 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 118 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

53 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 51 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 53Civil society 51Public authorities, academia, other 14

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

15 of 106
in the EU Register
37
full-time lobbying staff
€1.6M+
declared costs a year
28
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 1 Aug 2025 — it ran from 4 Jul 2025.

Policy area
Health & food (DG SANTE)
Where it stands
In planning
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2026

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence1 Aug 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communication.

118 positions · showing 25

D

DEPANA

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

We strongly support the ban on fur farming and trade in products derived from this practice. The fur industry causes enormous suffering to millions of animals, is unnecessary and is completely far from the current values of animal welfare in Europe. It also poses a risk to public health and has a considerable environmental impact.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
F

FBZPR

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

For centuries, humans have benefited from donations of nature, including fur skins, with respect for these animals. Humans also collect skins from other breeding animals of cattle, goats, sheep, asses, etc. Fur animals are an important part of the greenhouse gas biosequestration process, as they represent the highest level after ruminant animals, the world of plants and the microbiome of soils and waters.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
WA

World Animal Protection Danmark

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Fur farming has raised severe concerns for animal welfare, zoonoses and public health impact. (13) Deprivation, high morbidity and mortality, stress and abnormal behaviours were identified across 280 reviewed reports. (2) Pre-COVID approximately 17 million mink, and 45,000 Chinchillas were housed on farms in Denmark for fur production.

LinkedInX
ZZ

Związek Zawodowy "Wspólna Sprawa"

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The Common Affairs Union, which brings together people involved in nature conservation, the rational management of environmental resources and the development of a sustainable rural economy, expresses its firm opposition to the European Commission’s initiative to ban fur farming in the European Union.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AN

Asociación Natural KittyCat

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

As an animal protection association, we strongly support the ban on fur farming and trade in products derived from this practice. The fur industry causes enormous suffering to millions of animals, is unnecessary and is completely far from the current values of animal welfare in Europe. It also poses a risk to public health and has a considerable environmental impact.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GL

GIANNI LTD

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

My business has been active in the fur sector for 26 years. We have signed long-term sales contracts that we cannot cancel. We have received long-term loans with liabilities for many years. We are part of employment programmes, which will be directly affected by a ban. We have invested heavy capital, whose amortisation takes many years (Net Present Value).

Filed in Greek · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
KA

KARATZAS AEBE

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

KARATZAS S.A. is a Greek fur manufacture of exclusive fur coats. we are a second generation furriers. Banning fur will have a huge economical impact in Greece and especially in the area of Kastoria and Voio Kozanis. fur is not coming only from mink or foxes, is also coming from sheep, cows, deer, rabbit, animals that we consume their meat as well. Natural fur is sustainable and is the only eco friendly material.

LinkedInX
MA

MTÜ Animal Policy International

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Animal Policy International strongly supports the Fur Free Europe initiative and urges the European Commission to implement a comprehensive EU-wide ban on fur farming and the importation of farmed fur products. The evidence demonstrates that fur farming causes systemic animal suffering that cannot be addressed through welfare improvements, and the only solution is a ban on fur farming entirely.

LinkedInX
KT

KOTSIKA TATIANA

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Dear Sir/Madam, I am the owner of a sole proprietorship business active in the manufacture of fur clothing, based in Siatista Kozani. My business operates legally and responsibly, respecting all the rules laid down for the origin, quality and processing of raw materials.

Filed in Greek · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
WA

World Animal Protection Netherlands

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

World Animal Protection - a global nonprofit organization that works to end animal cruelty and protect farmed and wild animals - welcomes this consultation and, as an organization that has long strived for a fur-free world, we appreciate this opportunity to respond in the Call-for-Evidence for the Fur Free Europe Initiative.

LinkedInX
IR
PDF

The Władysław Grabski Agricultural Development Institute, as an analytical and scientific institution dedicated to the development of agricultural policies, European integration and modern agriculture in Poland, sets out its position on the European Commission’s initiative to ban fur farming in EU Member States.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
OO

Oddolny Ogólnopolski Protest Rolników

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The bottom-up National Farmers’ Protest, as a social movement representing the voice of farmers from all over Poland, expresses its categorical opposition to the European Commission’s planned initiative to ban fur farming in EU Member States.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
OR

OPZZ Rolników i Organizacji Rolniczych

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The OPZZ Farmers and Agricultural Organisations, as a union representing the interests of agricultural workers, expresses unequivocal and strong opposition to the European Commission’s proposed ban on fur farming in the European Union. Agriculture must remain multipurpose and diverse.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RM

Ruch Młodych Farmerów

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The Young Farmers movement, as an environment representing a young generation of farmers and food producers in Poland, expresses its unequivocal opposition to the EU’s initiative to ban fur farming contained in the proposal for a fur-free Europe. As young farmers, we call for evidence-based policies, the knowledge economy and respect for the diversity of farming models in the European Union.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ZZ

Związek Zawodowy Rolników „Orka”

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The Ork Farmers’ Union, representing the interests of working farmers and their families, strongly opposes the European Commission’s initiative to ban fur farming in the European Union. Fur farming is an integral part of the agricultural production structure in Poland, closely linked to the meat sector and processing.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IH

IPSC Holdings

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Opinion Statement: Why a Full EU Fur Ban Must Be Imposed Immediately The continued existence of fur farming and trade in the European Union represents an economic and political contradiction. As established by the 2025 EU Commission study on the fur industry, fur farming within the EU has not only become structurally unprofitablewith a sector-wide loss of 58.4 million and negative Gross Value Added (9.2 million)but…

LinkedInX
ZZ

Związek Zawodowy Rolnictwa „Samoobrona”,

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

The Samoobrona Agricultural Union, which represents the interests of Polish family farms, individual farmers and rural producers, strongly opposes the European Commission’s plans to ban fur farming in the European Union. Our position is based not only on the practical experience of thousands of farmers, but also on sound economic, environmental and legal analyses.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
PZ

Polski Związek Hodowców i Producentów Zwierząt Futerkowych

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The Polish Association of Furter Animal Breeders and Producers, representing national associations of breeders, processors and businesses active in the fur animal production sector, sets out its official position on the European Commission’s initiative to introduce a ban on fur farming in the European Union.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
PZ

Polski Związek Hodowców Zwierząt Futerkowych

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Position on the initiative: A fur-free Europe, the Association of Furter Animal Breeders, representing national producers and breeders of mink, foxes and other species kept for the extraction of natural skins, sets out its position in response to the European Commission’s consultation on the proposed ban on fur farming in the European Union.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
DI

Design in Pelz Constanze Saam

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

I see the ban on fur farming somewhat different. If a breeding does not comply with the EU Animal Welfare Regulation, the holding must be closed immediately. This also applies to all livestock farms, whether as meat, leather or fur breeders. The import of goods from non-European countries that do not meet the EU standard must be immediately banned.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
KR

Krajowa Rada Izb Rolniczych

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Warsaw, 31 July 2025, Position on the European Commission’s initiative: Fur-free Europe (Brussels, Better Regulation portal: Initiative 14669), ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the National Council of Agricultural Chambers, as representative body of Polish agricultural authorities, hereby express our strong opposition to the proposal to introduce a ban on fur farming at EU level.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
NS

NSZZ Solidarność Rolników Indywidualnych

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

NSZZ Solidarity of Individual Farmers’ position on the European Commission’s initiative: As a national trade union representing the interests of individual farmers and agricultural producers, a Europe free of fur NSZZ Solidarność Individual Farmers expresses its firm opposition to the European Commission’s initiative to ban fur farming in the Member States of the European Union.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IG

Instytut Gospodarki Rolnej

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

Warsaw, 27 July 2025, Position on the European Commission’s initiative: Fur-free Europe, the Institute of Agricultural Economy, as an independent research unit on the structure and functioning of the agricultural sector in Poland and Europe, sets out this position in the context of the European Commission’s public consultation on the fur-free Europe initiative.

Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BP

Berchtold Pelz-Leder Inh. Wolfgang Lastner

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

Future PELZ All talking about the future! We want to live sustainably, future-proof and more in harmony with nature. Future means, for example, in the garment sector, no synthetic fibres, no plastic (no multifunctional clothing, no steppjacks, no down jackets, no fleece parts). Recycled models also have a huge negative environmental footprint. Is that what we want?

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
VG

Verein Gegen Tierfabriken

· · filed 1 Aug 2025 · source

PDF

The AGREEMENT welcomes the opportunity to participate in the legislative process at this point and strongly advocates an EU-wide ban on fur farming and a ban on the sale of fur products on the European market. A large number of EU Member States have already banned fur farming at national level, recognising that fur production is a cruel practice and is unacceptable from an ethical point of view.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 118 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.