5 submissions from 5 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 55 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 5 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
0 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 5 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 0Civil society 5Public authorities, academia, other 0
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 22 Nov 2024 — it ran from 30 Aug 2024.
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Jun 2025
How it got here
Call for evidence · evaluation25 Sept 2023
Public consultation22 Nov 2024
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.
The AMIF and its absorption possibilities by Czech NGOs remained largely unchanged in the 2014-2020 reporting period. Most of its national challenges are addressed to components of state institutions and thus to implement a return policy.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
The Red Cross EU Office (RCEU) represents the 27 National Red Cross Societies in the EU, the Icelandic Red Cross, the Norwegian Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC).
If the AMIF implementation in 2014-2020 is considered mostly effective by the IRC, some problems persist in term of efficiency. For the IRC's semi-independent living (SIL) accommodation on unaccompanied children (UAC) project, the funds are calculated on a unit costs basis, allowing for the implementing organization to get paid based on the occupancy of the apartments.
Given the clearly limited target group of the AMIF NP, the most important recommendation for the future period is ensuring complementarity to AMIF. It is proposed to strengthen coordination between AMIF and ESF so that important integration measures can also be covered by the ESF for EU citizens.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
In 2011, Oxfam Italia become part of the reception system of the Tuscany Region to respond to the migratory flows toward Italy originating from the turmoil in North Africa. AMIF constituted one of the funding sources to support our work in the field, learn from other organizations in Europe and pilot innovative solutions to arising issues.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.